TOWARDS A THEORY OF REGIONAL CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AND RESILIENCE 

Masloboev Andrey Vladimirovich, doctor of technical sciences, associate professor, leading researcher, Institute of Informatics and mathematical modelling of technological processes of the Kola Science Centre RAS (14 Fersmana street, Apatite, Murmansk region, Russia), E-mail: masloboev@iimm.ru 

004.9, 681.5, 338.24 

10.21685/2307-4205-2020-4-13 

Background. The work is aimed at modern theory of complex system security development in the context of an integrated methodology design for critical infrastructure security and resilience (CISR) management and CISR research systematization of regional socioeconomic systems. The urgency of the study is conditioned by rising requirements for control operators and means for the purpose of CISR support at the regional level and the need to improve the regional security management system engineered on the basis of situational center network. The objective of research is to develop the theoretical and organizational-technical foundations of CISR management of the region as well as to analyze foreign experience in this field.
Materials and methods. The research is carried out by the example of critical infrastructures of the Murmansk region, which is a part of the Russian Arctic. Three key CISR domains (dimensions) of regional socio-economic systems are considered: technological, organizational and societal resilience. The methodological base of the study includes systems approach, conceptual modeling, and convergence of control theory, reliability theory, risk analysis, safety and stability theory methods.
Results and conclusions. An overview of the state-of-the-art research in the field of CISR management and an analysis of the existing models and methods applicability to problem-solving in this dynamic object domain are carried out. The novel holistic methodology of CISR analysis and management support is proposed. A conceptual model of CISR control system and a technique for resilience assessment of the regional critical objects and infrastructures have been developed. The application of theoretical developments will in prospect enhance the features of methods and tools used in practice to regional security support within the situational centers of the region, and to specify the information structure and forms of resilience management of the socio-economic systems as well as methods of risk assessment and analysis of the security violation of regional critical infrastructures. 

resilience, security, risk, critical infrastructure, regional socio-economic system, management, modeling, methodology 

1. O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ukaz Prezidenta RF № 683 ot 31.12.2015 [On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 683 of 31.12.2015]. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/40391 [In Russian]
2. Il'in N. I., Yusupov R. M. Informatizatsiya i svyaz' [Informatization and communication]. 2019, no. 3, pp. 7–13. [In Russian]
3. Masloboev A. V. Nadezhnost' i kachestvo slozhnykh system [Reliability and quality of complex systems]. 2019, no. 2 (26), pp. 43–59. [In Russian]
4. Pursiainen C. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2018, vol. 27, pp. 632–641.
5. Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection [ ]. Available at: https://eurlex. europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/114/oj
6. CIPedia© – A service of CIPRNet: Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) and Critical Infrastructure Resilience (CIR) related issues. Available at: https://websites.fraunhofer.de/CIPedia/index.php/CIPedia% C2%A9_Main_Page
7. Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Available at: https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology 8. Masloboev A. V., Bystrov V. V. Ekonomika. Informatika [Economy. Computer science]. 2020, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 555–572. [In Russian]
9. Holling C. S. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1973, no. 4 (1), pp. 1–23.
10. Pimm S. L. Nature. 1984, no. 307 (5949), pp. 321–326.
11. Hosseini S. A, Barker K., Ramirez-Marequez J. E. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2016, vol. 145, pp. 47–61.
12. Francis R., Bekera B. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2014, vol. 121, pp. 90–103.
13. Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning. Theoretical and Empirical Insights. Ed. by Y. Yamagata, A. Sharifi. Springer Intl. Publ., 2018, vol. 65, 228 p.
14. Righi A. W., Saurin T. A., Wachs P. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2015, vol. 141, pp. 142–152.
15. Rød B. et al. Safety and Reliability, Theory and Applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017, pp. 1039–1051.
16. Pursiainen C. et. al. Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017, pp. 2183–2189.
17. Tsygichko V. N., Chereshkin D. S., Smolyan G. L. Bezopasnost' kriticheskikh infrastruktur [Critical infrastructure safety and security]. Moscow: Krasand, 2018, 200 p. [In Russian]
18. Ofitserov A., Basov O., Bachurin S. Ekonomika. Informatika [Economy. Computer science]. 2020, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 154–163. [In Russian]
19. Shul'ts V. L., Kul'ba V. V., Shelkov A. B., Chernov I. V. Stsenarnyy analiz v upravlenii geopoliticheskim informatsionnym protivoborstvom [ ]. Moscow: Nauka, 2015, 542 p. [In Russian]
20. Aldrich P. A., Meyer M. A. American Behavioural Scientist. 2015, vol. 59, iss. 2, pp. 254–269.
21. Shishaev M., Fedorov A., Datyev I. Digitalization and Human Security. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Cybersecurity in the European High North. Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2020, pp. 267–295.
22. Petersen L. et al. IMPROVER D4.1. 2016. Available at: https://pauljreillydot.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/ improver-d4-1-social-resilience-criteria-for-critical-infrastructures-during-crises_draft.pdf
23. Labaka L., Hernantes J., Sarriegi J. M. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2015, vol. 141, pp. 92–105.
24. Polyak B. T., Shcherbakov P. S. Robastnaya ustoychivost' i upravlenie [Robust stability and control]. Moscow: Nauka, 2002, 303 p. [In Russian]
25. Rehaka D. et al. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 2019, vol. 25, pp. 125–138.
26. Pursiainen C., Gattinesi P. Publications Office of the European Union, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. 2014. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38627770.pdf.
27. Storesund K. et al. Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World. 2018, pp. 1221–1229.
28. Bruneau M. et al. Earthquake Spectre. 2003, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 733–752.
29. Flynn S. E. Foreign Affairs. 2008, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 2–8.
30. Zorn C. R., Shamseldin A. Y. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015, vol. 13, pp. 158–166.
31. Honfi D. et al. IMPROVER D3.2. 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/ downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5b12eb01d&appId= PPGMS
32. Masloboev A. V., Putilov V. A. Informatsionnoe izmerenie regional'noy bezopasnosti v Arktike [Information dimension of regional security in the Arctic]. Apatity: KNTs RAN, 2016, 222 p. [In Russian]